<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD Thuban hex core processor to be released by May 2010 ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/</link>
	<description>Tech Reviews from a different perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thuban podría llegar en Mayo del 2010 &#124; HardwareMX</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-31942</link>
		<dc:creator>Thuban podría llegar en Mayo del 2010 &#124; HardwareMX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-31942</guid>
		<description>[...]  &#013; Fuente &#013; OCWORKBENCH [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  &#013; Fuente &#013; OCWORKBENCH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbuder</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-26190</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbuder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-26190</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t build a pc in 10years and now that I clear out my old EASTEC tower I need help with which parts to get. Can someone give me a list, because the tec keeps advancing to fast. I went to build a gaming pc and I need a full list of parts that will work together without a big burn out when I start the pc up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t build a pc in 10years and now that I clear out my old EASTEC tower I need help with which parts to get. Can someone give me a list, because the tec keeps advancing to fast. I went to build a gaming pc and I need a full list of parts that will work together without a big burn out when I start the pc up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trendnet</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-11792</link>
		<dc:creator>trendnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-11792</guid>
		<description>we can see in the first half of 2010 six-core processors dropping from both Intel and AMD, according to leaky sources at motherboard manufacturers, with both the Intel Gulftown and AMD Thuban ranges hitting desktop computers. but now still now where to buy it because still too expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we can see in the first half of 2010 six-core processors dropping from both Intel and AMD, according to leaky sources at motherboard manufacturers, with both the Intel Gulftown and AMD Thuban ranges hitting desktop computers. but now still now where to buy it because still too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tplink</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>tplink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>I think we agreed that there is a significantly improve single-threaded performance, but still 3.4GHz Phenom II X4 965 was falling behind in benchmarks.  Alot opinion was that AMD has finally regained some pep in its step and that these new 6-core CPUs are going to give Intel&#039;s heart attack but let us see whether it&#039;s true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we agreed that there is a significantly improve single-threaded performance, but still 3.4GHz Phenom II X4 965 was falling behind in benchmarks.  Alot opinion was that AMD has finally regained some pep in its step and that these new 6-core CPUs are going to give Intel&#8217;s heart attack but let us see whether it&#8217;s true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manual Social Bookmarking</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-11028</link>
		<dc:creator>Manual Social Bookmarking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-11028</guid>
		<description>I searched for this data since a lengthy time. With your web site publish it are going to be feasible to acquire more facts in a shorter time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I searched for this data since a lengthy time. With your web site publish it are going to be feasible to acquire more facts in a shorter time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Fans</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-9505</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-9505</guid>
		<description>i imagine it was a bit rushed, and left out some options that not many individuals discuss about. Everybody knows that the majority new smartphones have web, so why show that primary perform at its bear minimum. Scroll up scroll down zoom in zoom out. Really? which new phone doesnt try this? How bout talk about how the text rearranges itsself. Additionally the texting, very poor review. Why didnt you point out you need to use the mic and textual content along with your voice? Overlooked ALOT of other more essential features</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i imagine it was a bit rushed, and left out some options that not many individuals discuss about. Everybody knows that the majority new smartphones have web, so why show that primary perform at its bear minimum. Scroll up scroll down zoom in zoom out. Really? which new phone doesnt try this? How bout talk about how the text rearranges itsself. Additionally the texting, very poor review. Why didnt you point out you need to use the mic and textual content along with your voice? Overlooked ALOT of other more essential features</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Processor Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Processor Benchmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>Sweet.... This is what I&#039;m looking for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet&#8230;. This is what I&#8217;m looking for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor F. Gautreaux</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor F. Gautreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>Hey, Found your blog on Google, glad I did, great site!! Keep it up! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Found your blog on Google, glad I did, great site!! Keep it up! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>Ok. I read a few times that AMD can&#039;t keep up with intel. Firstly I would like to state that many of AMD&#039;s CPUs can not keep up with intels. The ones that do not come respectively close though, and in some cases are neck to neck with intels. A lot of AMDs processors do beat a lot of intel processors also though. They are just ones that you normally do not hear a lot about because people just don&#039;t care about them in particular. AMD is not far behind intel though. They are very close behind them. Theres a good explanation why Intel was ahead a majority of the time in the processor game. Thats because intel crippled their compile code. It automatically used the most obsolete out dated instructions for all AMD processors. After this has been discovered, when you go back and look at benchmarks, it actually seems quite obvious that this is the case why AMD processors seemed to all most all ways fall short of expectations. Intel is forced to redesign a compiler that is fair to all AMD processors. Exactly when this will happen - who knows. But when it does, then we will see how AMD fairs up to Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. I read a few times that AMD can&#8217;t keep up with intel. Firstly I would like to state that many of AMD&#8217;s CPUs can not keep up with intels. The ones that do not come respectively close though, and in some cases are neck to neck with intels. A lot of AMDs processors do beat a lot of intel processors also though. They are just ones that you normally do not hear a lot about because people just don&#8217;t care about them in particular. AMD is not far behind intel though. They are very close behind them. Theres a good explanation why Intel was ahead a majority of the time in the processor game. Thats because intel crippled their compile code. It automatically used the most obsolete out dated instructions for all AMD processors. After this has been discovered, when you go back and look at benchmarks, it actually seems quite obvious that this is the case why AMD processors seemed to all most all ways fall short of expectations. Intel is forced to redesign a compiler that is fair to all AMD processors. Exactly when this will happen &#8211; who knows. But when it does, then we will see how AMD fairs up to Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phenom II X6 Series Details Surface, Slated for May 2010</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Phenom II X6 Series Details Surface, Slated for May 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: OCWorkbench [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: OCWorkbench [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMD Thuban Hex Core in May??? - Hardware Canucks</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD Thuban Hex Core in May??? - Hardware Canucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] Thuban Hex Core in May???    AMD Thuban hex core processor to be released by May 2010&#124;OCWorkbench  Enjoy!!!   __________________ Budget Gaming I AMD 5200+ @ 3.0Ghz; Asus M2A VM; 2gb DDR2-800 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thuban Hex Core in May???    AMD Thuban hex core processor to be released by May 2010|OCWorkbench  Enjoy!!!   __________________ Budget Gaming I AMD 5200+ @ 3.0Ghz; Asus M2A VM; 2gb DDR2-800 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMD Phenom II X6 al detalle y se vienen para Mayo &#124; MadBoxpc.com</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD Phenom II X6 al detalle y se vienen para Mayo &#124; MadBoxpc.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>[...] amigos de OCWorkbench han revelado algunos datos de los próximos procesadores AMD Phenom II X6 basados en el núcleo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] amigos de OCWorkbench han revelado algunos datos de los próximos procesadores AMD Phenom II X6 basados en el núcleo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg4422</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg4422</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>@ AI K Seltzer   Amazing someone can comment on the performance of the Phenom II X6, before the specs are released or a single bench mark detailed. Brillant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ AI K Seltzer   Amazing someone can comment on the performance of the Phenom II X6, before the specs are released or a single bench mark detailed. Brillant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al K.Seltzer</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Al K.Seltzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>This news if true is actually pretty ordinary. Sorry to say it but things aren&#039;t looking good for AMD until bulldozer (which will be 2 years late). They cant expect to compete against Intel&#039;s Core i5/i7 range for over 12 months with price cuts and with something that is not significantly better than phenom 2 X4 (a product designed to compete against the 2+ year old Core 2 gen!) Some website did a review comparing phenom 2 X4 and X6 at 2.6 GHz recently and the Phenom X6 is going to barely beat out the lowest core i7&#039;s let alone Intel&#039;s 980X. Where are the Phenom 2 FX&#039;s? 
I bought a 955 and Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H board because I was led to believe there would be a good long term upgrade path but now because it seems that bulldozer is going to be incompatable with AM3 and there is only the underwhelming phenom X6 processors guaranteed to work in socket AM3 I am having serious reservations about my purchase. Get your act together AMD or you will be struggling against VIA and making low end netbook CPU&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news if true is actually pretty ordinary. Sorry to say it but things aren&#8217;t looking good for AMD until bulldozer (which will be 2 years late). They cant expect to compete against Intel&#8217;s Core i5/i7 range for over 12 months with price cuts and with something that is not significantly better than phenom 2 X4 (a product designed to compete against the 2+ year old Core 2 gen!) Some website did a review comparing phenom 2 X4 and X6 at 2.6 GHz recently and the Phenom X6 is going to barely beat out the lowest core i7&#8242;s let alone Intel&#8217;s 980X. Where are the Phenom 2 FX&#8217;s?<br />
I bought a 955 and Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H board because I was led to believe there would be a good long term upgrade path but now because it seems that bulldozer is going to be incompatable with AM3 and there is only the underwhelming phenom X6 processors guaranteed to work in socket AM3 I am having serious reservations about my purchase. Get your act together AMD or you will be struggling against VIA and making low end netbook CPU&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Valdez</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>For the server lover I suppose. 

Six cores for application developement on the desktop along multiple hosts on a virtual machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the server lover I suppose. </p>
<p>Six cores for application developement on the desktop along multiple hosts on a virtual machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info Hardware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lançamento do Thuban adiantado para Maio</title>
		<link>http://en.ocworkbench.com/tech/amd-thuban-hex-core-processor-to-be-released-by-may-2010/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Info Hardware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lançamento do Thuban adiantado para Maio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ocworkbench.com/?p=1783#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>[...] o primeiro hexa-core da AMD viu o seu lançamento ser adiantado para Maio. Segundo o website OCworkbench, a AMD terá as primeiras unidades prontas em Maio deste ano, podendo apresenta-las oficialmente no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o primeiro hexa-core da AMD viu o seu lançamento ser adiantado para Maio. Segundo o website OCworkbench, a AMD terá as primeiras unidades prontas em Maio deste ano, podendo apresenta-las oficialmente no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

