WD VelociRaptor 1TB
The WD Velocirator 1TB is the highest end of the WD product range. Featuring a SATA 6Gbps interface with 10,000 RPM spin spin with 64MB cache, it offers the fastest speeds available on HDD. As it is suited for a workstation, it has a 1.4 million hours of MTBF and comes with a 5 years limited warranty.
If you look at the Hard disk, you would have noticed that the 2.5 inch hard drive is enclosed in a 3.5″ IcePack mounting frame. Guess what, the mounting frame as a built in heatsink which keeps the drive cool when installed in a chassis.
Other features of the Hard Drive includes Advance Format for increased areal densities. It also has Rotary acceleration feed forward (RAFF) that optimizes operation and performance when the drives are used in vibration-prone , multi drive chassis.
There is also the NoTouch ramp load technology which ensures the recording head from touching the disk media, this results in less wear and tear.
I recently upgraded my old poor PC with a 500G Western Digital WD5000AAKB drive (old PATA, 7200 RPM, 16MB cache) and it is quiet and fast, albeit secondhand drive. So looks like that for high capacity AND time reliability the classic HDDs are here to stay.
On the second hand, I did not managed to get my SSD working using PATA/SATA converter in another old lazy Dell PC (Dell OptiPlex GX110, 1GHz PIII, 512MB SDRAM, integrated Intel 810 graphic with 4MB own videoram). It works only in Windows, delaying the PC start by like 2-3min and refusing to boot from it.
So, SSD is not w/o a own set problems, and we did not need to get back to the reliability. The new SSD seems to be even less reliable (smaller size = less duration = useless to buy a expensive drive that die so soon…).
One of my friend who operates a datacentre
dare not even use SSD as they’re unreliable.
This is very poor for a technical article. While the premise that spinning hard drives give more capacity for your money is sound, the article is otherwise full of innacuracies and misunderstandings. For example, the comparison based on serial transfer rate is totally misguided. One of the biggest benefits of SSDs is their random access performance which completely decimates spinning disks and is why SSDs are just as appropriate for a desktop machine as a boot drive because the OS primarily does (a lot of) random reads and writes.
And starting the article with an anecdote about the author’s personal experience with a single SSD as evidence of a general problem. There are huge differences in quality between the brands and I can guess which brand they had since there’s one I wouldn’t touch with a barge pole. Clearly the author or burned by a bad SSD and that’s a good reason to steer clear of the cheaper brands unless you have a good backup solution…