WD Black series 4TB 7200RPM Hard Drive
Similar to the VelociRaptor, the WD Black series a 5 year limited warranty. With the WD Black series, you get a slightly slower 7200 RPM Hard Drive but you get higher capacity of up to 4TB.
This would definitely be an ideal choice to use as a backup solution since the capacity is big enough to hold all your multimedia files.
The WD Black series incorporates a dual processor which gives twice the processing power. It is aided by a dynamic cache which optimises cache allocation for read or write.
For mechanical protection, it has the same NoTouch Ramp Load technology just like the VelociRaptor series. In additoin, it has stableTrac to reduce system induced vibration and stablise platters for accurate tracking during read write operations.
WD also throws in a copy of the WD Acronis True Image (free download) tht enables you to upgrade your drive by cloning the old HDD. This will save you a lot of hours as you do not need to reinstall your operating system.
I recently upgraded my old poor PC with a 500G Western Digital WD5000AAKB drive (old PATA, 7200 RPM, 16MB cache) and it is quiet and fast, albeit secondhand drive. So looks like that for high capacity AND time reliability the classic HDDs are here to stay.
On the second hand, I did not managed to get my SSD working using PATA/SATA converter in another old lazy Dell PC (Dell OptiPlex GX110, 1GHz PIII, 512MB SDRAM, integrated Intel 810 graphic with 4MB own videoram). It works only in Windows, delaying the PC start by like 2-3min and refusing to boot from it.
So, SSD is not w/o a own set problems, and we did not need to get back to the reliability. The new SSD seems to be even less reliable (smaller size = less duration = useless to buy a expensive drive that die so soon…).
One of my friend who operates a datacentre
dare not even use SSD as they’re unreliable.
This is very poor for a technical article. While the premise that spinning hard drives give more capacity for your money is sound, the article is otherwise full of innacuracies and misunderstandings. For example, the comparison based on serial transfer rate is totally misguided. One of the biggest benefits of SSDs is their random access performance which completely decimates spinning disks and is why SSDs are just as appropriate for a desktop machine as a boot drive because the OS primarily does (a lot of) random reads and writes.
And starting the article with an anecdote about the author’s personal experience with a single SSD as evidence of a general problem. There are huge differences in quality between the brands and I can guess which brand they had since there’s one I wouldn’t touch with a barge pole. Clearly the author or burned by a bad SSD and that’s a good reason to steer clear of the cheaper brands unless you have a good backup solution…